STAT2000_Laureate_Report-Structure.Docx 1Structure of a quantitative research paperWe generally find the following structure in quantitative research papers.Non-numbered: Abstract1. Introduction2. Literature review and hypotheses development3. Methodology4. Results5. Findings and analysis (or discussion)6. ConclusionsAbstractAn abstract is a short summary (e.g., 150 words) of a research article. 1. IntroductionThis section discusses the background and motivation of the study. Whilst the primary motivation for academic research comes from the gap in the literature, the need for the study should be made clear. Unless there are some perceived benefits and practical (or policy) implications, there is no need to do a research. Once the importance of the research topic is explained and the gap in the literature is identified, the research question (s) are raised in this section. There might be variation to writing the research questions. Some research mentions the research aims (or objectives) instead of formulating the research questions. Both approaches are very common and accepted.2. Literature review and hypotheses developmentThe literature review and hypotheses development section formulates the testable hypotheses to answer the research questions introduced in Section 1. Hypotheses are developed ex-ante (before the data collection) and so it is generally advised that these should be based on the theory or intuitive reasoning rather than grounded on other empirical evidence. It is also suggested to have directional (e.g., positively or negatively related) hypotheses rather than non-directional (e.g., related). Non-directional hypotheses are considered exploratory, for example where theory cannot provide an unambiguous expectation, and so it is better to put effort into developing an ex-ante prediction.3. MethodologyWe need to explain the way the hypotheses will be tested. This section covers the data, model and estimation procedure. STAT2000_Laureate_Report-Structure.Docx 23.1. DataSampling and data sources are covered under data.3.2. Model and estimation proceduresA multiple regression model may appear as follows:Dependent variable = Intercept + Coefficient (s) Ã Independent variable (s) + Coefficient (s) Ã Control variable (s) + Error termYi = ?0 + ?i Xi + ?i Zi + ?The full form model expression (spelling out each variable) depends on the data structure. For example, if two variables on the right hand side of the equation are highly correlated, we may include only one of these two variables. For this reason, descriptive statistics are provided in the data section. The estimation procedure depends on a number of factors including the types of variables. For example, if the dependent variable is continuous (i.e., can take on any value within a limit), an ordinary least square regression (OLS) estimation might be suitable. If the dependent variable is dichotomous (i.e., takes on a value of either 1 or 0), a logistic regression (logit) estimation might be appropriate.4. ResultsThis section presents the results of the estimation. Generally, the regression outputs are reported in this section. The regression analysis comments on the model fit, explanatory power and statistically significant variables. It also presents additional analyses for robustness.5. Findings and analysisFindings of the study are discussed in this section. The discussion involves interpreting the statistical output. More specifically, the discussions should be for a general audience as well as experts in the field. So a non-technical explanation is always useful for a wider audience. The findings are also evaluated by comparing with similar previous studies to position this study in the literature. Economic interpretations (if this can be done) also improve the quality of the research. For example, an increase of $1,000 in payment for attending meeting reduces the meeting non-attendance problem of directors.STAT2000_Laureate_Report-Structure.Docx 36. ConclusionsThis section sums up the study. For a reader who is too busy to read the whole paper, this section should provide a summary of the whole paper. It should touch base on the research questions, the hypotheses, the test results, major findings, practical and policy implications, and the contribution of the study.Jyotirmoy PodderDisclaimer: The views expressed are mine. The objective of research is to enhance our knowledge with breadth and depth and so does not have a âone size fits allâ approach. You may find variations of the structure (framework), but the main coverage of a research paper mostly includes what is discussed in section 1 through section.
CF Unit4 P7-3 Evaluating FourP7-3 Evaluating Four Alternative Inventory Methods Based on Income and Cash Flow LO7-2, 7-3At the end of January 2014, the records of Donner Company showed the following for a particular item that sold at $16 per unit:Transactions UnitsAmount Inventory, January 1, 2014 500 $ 2,3654.73 Purchase, January 12 600 3,6006 Purchase, January 26 160 1,2808 Sale (370) Sale (250)Required:1a. Compute Cost of Goods Sold under each method of inventory: average cost, FIFO, LIFO, and specific identification. For specific identification, assume that the first sale was selected from the beginning inventory and the second sale was selected from the January 12 purchase. (Round unit price to 2 decimal places. Input all amounts as positive values.)Input areas are shaded.Average CostCost of Good Available for SaleCost of Goods Sold# of UnitsCost per UnitCost of Goods Available for Sale# of Units SoldCost per UnitCost of Goods SoldBeginning inventoryPurchases:January 12, 2014January 26, 2014Total FIFOCost of Goods Available for SaleCost of Goods Sold# of UnitsCost per UnitCost of Goods Available for Sale# of Units SoldCost per UnitCost of Goods SoldBeginning inventory$0 Purchases:January 12, 2014$0January 26, 2014$0Total – $00 LIFOCost of Goods Available for SaleCost of Goods Sold# of UnitsCost per UnitCost of Goods Available for Sale# of Units SoldCost per UnitCost of Goods SoldBeginning inventory Purchases:January 12, 2014 January 26, 2014 Total – $ – 0 $ 4,040Specific IdentificationCost of Goods Available for SaleCost of Goods Sold# of UnitsCost per UnitCost of Goods Available for Sale# of Units SoldCost per UnitCost of Goods SoldBeginning inventory Purchases:January 12, 2014 January 26, 2014 Total – $ – 0 Required:2a. FIFO and LIFO, which method would result in the higher pretax income?2b. FIFO and LIFO, which would result in the higher EPS?3 FIFO and LIFO, which method would result in the lower income tax expense? Assume a 30 percent average tax rate.4 FIFO and LIFO, which method would produce the more favorable cash flow?